Agree on the Receiving Network Before Sharing Payment Instructions

An address is only one part of receiving instructions. Sender and recipient also need to agree on the network and asset representation, especially when the same address format is used across several EVM chains.

Write the intended destination context

Record the receiving account, network name and chain ID, asset and official token contract where applicable. Native ETH has no ordinary ERC-20 contract address, while USDC identity depends on the deployment. Circle’s directory lists separate contracts across networks. A screenshot showing only a ticker and shortened address leaves important ambiguity unresolved, even when both people recognize the same wallet application.

Check the sender’s delivery choices

A sending service may offer several withdrawal networks or token representations. Its menu label must match the receiver’s documented supported route, not merely a similar currency name. If the destination is a service account, read that service’s own deposit instructions, including any additional requirements. An address-format match cannot establish that the service will recognize or credit an asset arriving through an unsupported network.

Use an EVM example carefully

For a conventional key-controlled account, the same hexadecimal address may be used on Ethereum and Base, yet the balances and transaction histories are distinct. Contract accounts require additional care because deployment and behavior can differ between chains. Choosing Base at the sending service does not automatically bridge existing Ethereum assets through RunixCoin. Base mainnet 8453 also differs from Base Sepolia 84532, despite both using ETH for gas.

Verify before any transfer decision

Compare the complete address through a trusted channel, confirm the network and asset identity together, and stop if the parties cannot reconcile their instructions. This page performs no transfer or test payment and does not guarantee recovery for a mistaken network. RunixCoin’s public quote form is not a receiving service or bridge and execution remains unavailable. Preserve the agreed public context so any later receipt can be checked on the correct explorer.

References and verification

Reviewed 10 November 2026. Product limits reflect inspected public interface code. These are educational checklists, not reports of tested mainnet transactions; browser behavior and execution were not verified.