Read a Failed Transaction Receipt Before Retrying

A failed receipt describes an included transaction whose top-level execution failed. It is different from a quote timeout or a request you rejected before submission. Establish which situation occurred before investigating a remedy.

Confirm the receipt belongs to your request

Start with the transaction hash recorded by the wallet and open it on the explorer for the intended chain. Compare the sender, destination, time and operation with what you intended. Do not rely on the latest row in an activity list when several requests were made close together. Record the network alongside the hash so a later review does not accidentally use another explorer.

Read status rather than guessing from gas

EIP-658 defines receipt status 0 as failure and 1 as success. A hexadecimal RPC response commonly represents failure as 0x0. Gas consumption alone cannot establish the result: reverted execution need not consume the whole gas limit. An explorer’s error explanation can provide context, but keep that explanation separate from the receipt status itself. A missing receipt is a different unresolved state.

Identify what needs investigation

Write a short comparison of the intended action and the observed outcome. Was this a token approval, transfer or exchange? Was an output minimum involved? Was the destination expected? Preserve the exact error text privately, with sensitive browser data removed. If a reason is unclear, leave it unresolved rather than treating a larger gas limit or a wider slippage tolerance as an automatic solution.

Review earlier permissions separately

A failed exchange does not settle the status of a separate approval sent earlier. Look up that approval independently and inspect the current permission if relevant. Do not repeat an approval simply because the later request failed. RunixCoin’s public form currently supplies quotes without swap execution, so an error in that form is not evidence of a failed on-chain exchange. This guide diagnoses existing evidence and does not ask you to retry or sign.

References and verification

Reviewed . Product limits reflect inspected public interface code. These are educational checklists, not reports of tested mainnet transactions; browser behavior and execution were not verified.